[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-register-public] [task #11662] Submission of BLACK (Big Linker

From: Paulo H. Torrens
Subject: [Savannah-register-public] [task #11662] Submission of BLACK (Big Linker, Assembler and Compiler Kit)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:44:50 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pt-BR; rv: Gecko/20111107 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.24

Follow-up Comment #2, task #11662 (project administration):

Some questions...

"In GNU programs the license is usually in a file called COPYING.", is this
mandatory? I haven't written COPYING yet, but it will mostly contain data
about the exceptions and terms about another programming languages (such as
Ada's generics), and state that the complete license is at doc/GPL and
doc/LGPL (files which are already in the tarball).

What is wrong with the licensing headers? Is it the copyright dates, the word
"copyright" itself, or anything else?


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via/by Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]