[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-register-public] [task #14106] Submission of Serpents

From: jchmrt
Subject: Re: [Savannah-register-public] [task #14106] Submission of Serpents
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 23:26:50 +0200


Thanks for reviewing. I think you are right about the ubuntu font,
according to this wikipedia article[1], both debian and fedora have
reviewed the license as non-free.

I have chosen Lato as a replacement, which is licensed under the SIL
Open Font License 1.1[2], which is FSF approved[3].

Are there any other steps I should take for the project to get approved?

Thanks again,


On 2016-07-30 19:58, Hugh Mayfield wrote:
Update of task #14106 (project administration):

                  Status:                    None => In Progress
             Assigned to:                    None => hlam


Follow-up Comment #1:

Jochem, thanks for submitting. The project looks fine, except for the below.

List: there is a font included in the tarball licensed under the "Ubuntu Font License." I can't see that this is either covered on the FSF's commented list
of licenses [1], or listed as license option on the Savannah project
registration page. The license does to my non-legal mind look like it might be acceptable, but I don't want to approve before checking what we should do
in this situation - please advise.



Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via/by Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]