[task #16584] Submission of StoneValley

[John Cage]

Follow-up Comment #41, task #16584 (group administration):


> I'm afraid this still sounds confusing to me.  We have discussed that
> the copyright holders were not bound by the licenses they apply to
> their programs.  Don't you remember that?

Yes, I remember. The license can not restrict what the copyright holders
choose to do. However, as a man who wants to convey library to others under
LGPL license, I may use the license as a guide to add or remove a copy of the
license itself. Though it is not compulsory to bind license with the project,
I choose to add both GPL and LGPL with StoneValley project.


> Then I wonder how you listed the files to check in your tarball,
> and how you checked them.

I follow this guide:

> You sent me the link mentioned these following 2 types of  copyrightable
> files:
>
> a) For copyright purpose, any file more than ten lines long is nontrivial,
so
> it should have copyright and license notices.
>
> b) If some of your files cannot carry such notices (e.g. binary files),
then
> you can add a README file in the same directory containing the copyright
and
> license notices.

1st, I add copyright notice to the README files shows this whole project is
published under the LGPL license.

2nd, Every file more than 10 lines long is added with copyright notice.



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16584>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature