[task #16584] Submission of StoneValley

[Ineiev]

Follow-up Comment #50, task #16584 (group administration):


> Yes, sir/madam there are line 7 and line 25 of the ./README file.

To be precise, the first instance is lines 5-14.

> > Now you should learn to specify the licensing terms of > your package
consistently.
> 
> Thank you sir/madam, I ignore this issue because my carelessness.
> I advance revised my tarball in this comment.

Thank you!  As far as I can see, you still declare the licensing conditions
twice in the same README file, in different wordings.  Am I wrong?  If not,
why do you do that?

> No, sir/madam, currently I have no questions with it. I've heard copyleft
concept in Mr. Stallman's article.

Gorgeous.  Now, can you tell what it means for two licenses to be compatible? 
Are GPL and FDL compatible or not?  What documentation files does your tarball
contain?


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16584>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature