[task #16584] Submission of StoneValley

[John Cage]

Follow-up Comment #51, task #16584 (group administration):


> Thank you!  As far as I can see, you still declare the licensing conditions
twice in the same README file, in different wordings.  Am I wrong?  If not,
why do you do that?

Sorry to bother you, sir/madam. In file #56563, at line 25, there is "*) The
whole project is published under GNU Lesser General Public License version 3
or (at your option) any later version." I think I revised it from "*) The
whole project is published with GNU Lesser General Public License version 3.".
Please check the README file's sha256sum, it should be
"87007d4ffeeb2716258f5de1e08c8afef21d399202cbf720d08f4123b99fdcf7".


> Gorgeous.  Now, can you tell what it means for two licenses to be
compatible?  Are GPL and FDL compatible or not?  What documentation files does
your tarball contain?

If two licenses are compatible, it means that two licenses are interchangeable
for some conditions, such as if you use GPL for your project, you could use
FDL in the sub files of your program, and these two licenses are not conflict
with each other.
GPL and FDL are compatible.
My tarball basically contains three README files as documents, they are
./README ans ./Examples/README, additionally there is a file ./NOTICE is
another document.
I am not sure whether ./svlogo.png is a document, because it is just a picture
for propaganda purpose.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16584>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature