[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-users] Savannah's x.509 certificate fingerprints
From: |
Taylor R Campbell |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-users] Savannah's x.509 certificate fingerprints |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:30:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/7.7.90.+ |
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:36:19 +0200
From: Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden>
Yes, the page had links to download outdated certificates from last
year (the fingerprints are up-to-date).
Thanks! I forgot to check the expiration dates on the certificates
while I was examining them; that would have been a rather obvious
tip-off.
I fixed the page and added instructions on how to display/check the
certificates using GnuTLS, and also how to extract the certificate out
of the running server.
Excellent, this is very helpful.
There are a few HTML errors in that page now (or were there before):
. mismatched <h2>Certificates</h1> at the top;
. superfluous </a> in the list of certificates, in the entry for
cvs.*gnu.org;
. doubled, unclosed heading: <h2>Check for yourself!<h2>;
. non-escaped angled-brackets in the GnuPG output surrounding email
addresses -- `<address@hidden>' instead of `<address@hidden>' --
and in shell examples -- `certool -i < savannah.gnu.org.crt' instead
of `certool -i < savannah.gnu.org.crt'; and
. doubled, unclosed anchor: <a href="...certtool.html">doc<a>.
I can fix all this and send a corrected page if you'd like.
Also, I wonder whether it might be worth mentioning that if the pages
are downloaded with `curl', the authenticity of the server can be
implicitly checked simply by specifying `ca.crt' with the `--cacert'
option; that is, after fetching `ca.crt', one can run `curl --cacert
ca.crt -O http://savannah.gnu.org/tls/....crt'. There may be a
similar option for `wget', but I don't know.
Finally, it's a little confusing to have a file named
`cvs.*gnu.org.crt', even though it works on Unix. I suspect that it
may not work on Windows, but I don't know for certain -- haven't
touched a Windows machine in over a decade! --, and I don't know
whether you folks care about that. It can be mildly flummoxing to
have to deal with escaping the asterisk in Unix shells, however.