[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated |
Date: |
Wed, 8 May 2013 22:51:39 GMT |
It is actually telling us what it thinks is wrong.
What I had in mind was a message specific to the purportedly-bad
password, like "sequence oo causes failure of N3". Maybe embedded in
debugging/logging/verbose kind of output. You get the idea. Anyway.
First I would definitely propose we set match=0
I'm fine with that, FWIW.
if it fails pwqcheck I would like to look to see if it is a false
positive. Look to see if it has a reasonable amount of character
classes and if so then mark it okay.
Also sounds good to me.
Basically do what pwqcheck says that it is doing but isn't.
Indeed. I wonder if there is some sort of pwqcheck development going on
somewhere, newer version, etc...
Thanks,
k
- [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Bob Proulx, 2013/05/07
- Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Ineiev, 2013/05/07
- Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Jan Owoc, 2013/05/07
- Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Karl Berry, 2013/05/07
- Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Jan Owoc, 2013/05/08
- Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Bob Proulx, 2013/05/13
- Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Jan Owoc, 2013/05/13
- Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Bob Proulx, 2013/05/15
- Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Ineiev, 2013/05/17
- Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Ineiev, 2013/05/14
Re: [Savannah-users] password must be more complicated, Bruce Korb, 2013/05/09