[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[screen-devel] [bug #66336] v5.0.0 obvious regressions from v4.9.1
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[screen-devel] [bug #66336] v5.0.0 obvious regressions from v4.9.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:30:23 -0400 (EDT) |
URL:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66336>
Summary: v5.0.0 obvious regressions from v4.9.1
Group: GNU Screen
Submitter: None
Submitted: Tue 15 Oct 2024 03:30:20 PM UTC
Category: None
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: 5.0.0
Fixed Release: None
Planned Release: None
Work Required: None
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comments:
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue 15 Oct 2024 03:30:20 PM UTC By: Anonymous
If you do a "git diff v.4.9.1 v5.0.0" there are a lot of obvious regressions
from 4.9.1 to 5.0.0. The most immediately noticeable is the reintroduction of
dozens (maybe hundreds) of typos in documentation, change logs, code comments,
etc.
But it appears to be more than that. Looking "git log -p v.4.9.1..v.5.0.0"
there seems to be a whole series of bug fixes and commits left out because
5.0.0 was not based on 4.9.1 at all.
I understand there are a lot of changes in version 5 and not every patch in
4.9.1 is applicable, but I couple I looked into seemed to be true regressions.
I'm not familiar enough with the code to make a fair judgement.
But the many regressions in documentation and comments make it pretty clear
that this was not (or should not have been) intentional.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66336>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [screen-devel] [bug #66336] v5.0.0 obvious regressions from v4.9.1,
anonymous <=