[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fFtT implementation

From: Rafal Maszkowski
Subject: Re: fFtT implementation
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:22:26 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:38:36PM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:03:34PM +0100, Juergen Weigert wrote:
> > On Dec 16, 05 12:39:50 +0100, Rafal Maszkowski wrote:
> > > What I plan to do is:
> > > - establish screen-devel list
> Doesn't make sense as the current list isn't high traffic.

Sorry, maybe I was too fast with this. But we can always hope that the traffic
will increase.

> > > - include ma sockdr/status patch - I use it successfully since some 2
> > > years
> Hmm, I'll have to check this patch. I don't think I have applied it to the
> current devel version yet, so either I didn't like it or something else was
> wrong.

I am not sure if it was you I was discussing the previous version with. Anyway
I have added man page patch. So what may be wrong still?

> > > - work on optimizing resize if time allows (my time resources are very 
> > > tight)
> Who's time resources aren't? ;-)
> The resize "slowness" is basically because screen resizes all windows
> if you reattach. We could change that to "lazy resize".

I'd love to have a lazy version of screen. Do you plan it for 4.0.4?

> > > - release 4.0.3?
> Hey, don't release 4.0.3 for us! Or do you want to create a branch?

No, I wan't. I had such a sinful thought but if the original developers are
still alive I am not going to disturb in the development. Maybe I could help a
little e.g. by applying my sockdir/status patch - if you accept it.

Jeżeli upadnie cywilizacja zachodnia, to będzie szansa na odbudowę cywilizacji
      chrześcijańskiej. (dr Stanisław Krajski, Radio Maryja, 10 X 2001)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]