[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem
From: |
Theodore Roth |
Subject: |
Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem |
Date: |
Tue Jul 30 13:18:10 2002 |
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, John Regehr wrote:
:) So just to be clear, I should be using the very latest gcc? I guess it
:) would be pre-3.2? I ask since I've heard that keeping up with the
:) latest gcc CVS is a good way to get failed compiles and broken
:) compilers.
Yes. Check out the head of the cvs tree. You won't have to do that after
3.2 is released though. Yes, using the cvs stuff can break occasionally,
but it's a necessary evil. I've been using the cvs stuff exclusively for
two months now and haven't had but a few broken builds of avr-gcc which
Marek fixed promptly.
Besides, using the latest cvs tools is the only way to get mega128 support
without some rather massive patching. :-(
:) Ok, thanks. I use the newer versions since I was getting bitten by some
:) limitations of the older automakes.
;-)
Ted Roth
- [Simulavr-devel] compile problem, John Regehr, 2002/07/29
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem, Theodore Roth, 2002/07/30
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem, John Regehr, 2002/07/30
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem, Theodore Roth, 2002/07/30
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem, John Regehr, 2002/07/30
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem,
Theodore Roth <=
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem, John Regehr, 2002/07/30
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem, Theodore Roth, 2002/07/30
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem, John Regehr, 2002/07/30
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem, Theodore Roth, 2002/07/30