From address@hidden Tue Jan 8 12:34:20 2008 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:07:07 -0600 (CST) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: address@hidden Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details The original message was received at Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:06:51 -0600 (CST) from localhost [127.0.0.1] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- (reason: 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to atmel.com.s7a1.psmtp.com.: >>> RCPT To: <<< 451 Recipients not all at same mail host - psmtp ... Deferred: 451 Recipients not all at same mail host - psmtp ... while talking to atmel.com.s7a2.psmtp.com.: >>> RCPT To: <<< 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown [ Part 2: "Delivery Status" ] Reporting-MTA: dns; web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost Arrival-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:06:51 -0600 (CST) Final-Recipient: RFC822; address@hidden Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; atmel.com.s7a2.psmtp.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:06:56 -0600 (CST) [ Part 3: "Included Message" ] Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:06:51 -0600 (CST) From: Michael Hennebry To: Joerg Wunsch Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Missing -fPIC when compiling code for .so files? On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > Indeed, I cannot see a -fPIC anywhere anyhow during the compilation > before. How is it supposed to work at all then? Is it just working > accidentally on the i386 platform since omitting -fPIC is perhaps > benign there? One of the tweaks I had to make when compiling the firt time was to add -fPIC. My recollection is that not having -fPIC or one of its relatives results in self-modifying code. SELinux objected to this by not letting my program run very long. I don't remember how complex the modifications are or how it affects subsequent efficiency. -- Michael address@hidden "I AM DEATH, NOT TAXES. *I* TURN UP ONLY ONCE." -- Death