[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavr error

From: William Rivet
Subject: RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavr error
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:11:07 -0400

Ok, please let this topic ride for a few more weeks...I have not yet
tried to build/debug on cygwin nor on MSVC or like. (I think I have MSVC
still) I have had actual time to work on simulavrxx  in the last few
weeks, and I'm getting several hours more to tinker in the next few as

There was some small niggle in getting it to compile/run when I tried it
though I hear reports others had no such trouble...moot point ATM. It
doesn't appear to be workable today. 

I'm about 80% done with getting a reasonable CMAKE + "simple makefile"
based build that demonstrates buildign simulavrxx + tcl binding + python
binging + anacomp for both tcl and python. 

With that minimum done, checked in and released, I'd be willing to chase
down other platforms like cygwin, mingw, MSVC (dot-net or whatever...if
there are helpful folks out there for what tools I don't have)



On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 11:30 -0600, Weddington, Eric wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Klaus Rudolph [mailto:address@hidden 
> > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 12:15 AM
> > To: Weddington, Eric
> > Cc: Michael N. Moran; address@hidden; Dhruvesh Patel
> > Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavr error
> > 
> > Hi Eric,
> > 
> > >>
> > >> Lets finish all the discussions... what is actually 
> > required from the 
> > >> "outside world"? As I said: "My" simulavrxx is running fine 
> > >> on multiple 
> > >> unix systems. What is needed from the others??? What can I do 
> > >> now to get 
> > >> your problems solved?
> > > 
> > > Build it with MinGW / MSYS so Windows users can use it....
> > > 
> > 
> > Like to hear that :-) But I have no windows system running since now 
> > more than 10 years. Sorry, I could not spend so much time to get a 
> > windows system running and I also want not to spend so much money for 
> > hardware, software and maintenance! :-)
> > 
> Then just realize that the usefulness of simulavrxx is limited because
> it does not run on Windows. It's just a fact that there are many more
> users on Windows than Linux/FreeBSD/Mac OS X. I would certainly like to
> see support available on all platforms. But since simulavrxx does not
> run on Windows, this is why simulavr still exists and still needs
> support.
> Honestly, if this situation continues then I would strongly suggest that
> the projects (simulavr, simulavrxx) be separated for
> ease-of-maintenance.
> Eric Weddington
> _______________________________________________
> Simulavr-devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]