Re: [Simulavr-devel] HWPort pointers

[Michael Hennebry]

On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, ThomasK wrote:

> I think, not really a reason for this. Some have made this with pointers, 
> some as static instance. Maybe it's a good idea to make it all in the same 
> way, if there isn't a special reason to take the other way.

> Am 17.11.2013 07:48, schrieb Michael Hennebry:
> > I've noticed that in header files whose names end in base.h
> > all the HWPort's are direct members.
> > In the other MCU headers, the HWPort's have pointers to them.
> > Is there a reason for this?
> > The sole exception seems to be portx in at8515.h .

I'd say make them all static instances.
'Twould eliminate some unneeded indirection.
I'm pretty sure they can all be initialized in the pre-body
portions of the constructors of the classes that use them.

--
Michael   address@hidden
"On Monday, I'm gonna have to tell my kindergarten class,
whom I teach not to run with scissors,
that my fiance ran me through with a broadsword."  --  Lily