[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?
From: |
Ted Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be? |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:03:24 -0500 |
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 20:45 -0500, Matt Lee wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 08:38 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
>
> > I want to be able to point to GNU Social and daisycha.in as a drop-in
> > replacement for non-free network services.
>
> I don't want anyone to create a monolithic service, where everyone uses
> one big instance. Not for this.
I'm not advocating for a monolithic or centralized system; just one that
can solve existing problems, like identi.ca solves the twitter problem.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, (continued)
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Blaise Alleyne, 2010/03/04
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Ted Smith, 2010/03/04
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Ted Smith, 2010/03/04
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Blaise Alleyne, 2010/03/04
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Toby Inkster, 2010/03/05
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Hellekin O. Wolf, 2010/03/08
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Hugo Roy, 2010/03/04