[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Social-mediagoblin] Templates, CSS, Images, JS, licensing

From: Matt Lee
Subject: Re: [Social-mediagoblin] Templates, CSS, Images, JS, licensing
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:31:44 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9

On 04/13/2011 07:29 PM, Rob Myers ||
> On 14/04/11 00:21, Matt Lee wrote:
>> I think the template code should be under the LGPL v3.
> Please could you explain the reasoning behind these specific choices? I
> don't mean that I agree or disagree with them, just that I'd like to
> understand them better.


For JavaScript -- GPL is a fine license. AGPL isn't needed and we
shouldn't apply it without thinking about why we need it.

For templates -- LGPL is a permissive license that's also upwardly
compatible with GPL and thus AGPL... I suppose another permissive
license would also be okay too.


Sent from my computer

Are you my close, personal friend?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]