[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: -r option
RE: -r option
Sun, 16 Mar 2003 21:34:18 -0800
Interesting... I am also using SpamAssassin 2.5. I did not try using
the -r option until after I upgraded to it.
Does the -r option merely pass a flag to SpamAssassin, or does it do
something internal to the milter? Perhaps the option has changed in SA.
I'll have to review the documentation. I know several options are
different in 2.50, I had to make some changes when I upgraded.
From: Tony Shadwick [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 9:43 PM
To: Dan Nelson
Cc: Jeff Powell; address@hidden
Subject: Re: -r option
This is failing for me as well, both on FreeBSD and MacOS X. I thought
perhaps my syntax was incorrect, but now that I see I'm not the only
As an aside, it WAS working for a very brief period on FreeBSD until I
upgraded to SA 2.5. I don't know if it's related or not.
Manager of Internet Services
Strategic Technology Group
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Mar 16), Jeff Powell said:
> > I can't get the -r option to work!
> > I am running Mandrake Linux 9.0 and Sendmail 8.12.8. I have created
> > the spamass-milter file in /etc/sysconfig and given ownership to
> > user nobody, group nogroup. I am using Nigel Horne's initscript. I
> > know the initscript is reading the file in /etc/sysconfig because it
> > complains if I make a deliberate mistake in the file. My file
> > contains this:
> > SM_EXTRA_FLAGS="-u user -r 9"
> This is what you should see with -r:
> Mar 16 00:00:34 <2.6> dan spamd: processing message
> <address@hidden> for root:26. Mar 16
> 00:00:40 <2.6> dan spamd: identified spam (43.1/8.0) for
> root:26 in 6.0 seconds, 1924 bytes. Mar 16 00:00:40 <2.6> dan
> sm-mta: h2G60XZt094358: Milter: data, reject=550 5.7.1 Blocked
> by SpamAssassin
> Also, do you really have a fallback user called "user"? Using a
> nonexistant one shoudln't do any harm, not that I think about it
> Dan Nelson
> Spamass-milt-list mailing list