Re: Upgrading from 0.2.0 to CVS brings a recursing surprise

[Joe Maimon]

Dan Nelson wrote:

> I'm open to suggestions here; my best idea is add the ability to
> specify a range of scores that each flag applies to.  So something
> like:
>
> -B ">0<5 address@hidden"
> -b ">=5<20 address@hidden"
> -r ">=20<50 Almost certainly spam. Go away plzkthx"
>
> which will cause a bcc to one address at low scores, a full redirect to
> another at medium scores, and a bounce with a custom message at really
> high scores.
>
>  
In theory the -B switch could overlap the -r range, while the -b can 
only overlap the -B

In theory it would be interesting to support multiple invocations of 
these switches.
Usefull for reviewing different score ranges in different buckets.

To make this complete, a -s for discard option is also needed.