[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1
From: |
Dan Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1 |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:11:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
In the last episode (Jun 25), Steven W. Orr said:
> On Sunday, Jun 25th 2006 at 11:17 -0400, quoth Steven W. Orr:
> =>I just upgraded and now I'm getting a changed (and unwanted
> =>behavior).
> =>
> =>My startup optios are:
> =>
> =>EXTRA_FLAGS="-m -u steveo -r -1 -i 192.168.0.1/24 -i 127.0.0.1/24"
> =>
> =>What's happening now is that the spam is being delivered to me as
> =>if the -r option is not there. I am running a few mailinglists here
> =>and I think the problem is happening to messages that are sent to
> =>an address that has no user (like a listname).
> =>
> =>What can I do to cause these messages to be rejected like they were
> =>with the older version.
>
> It looks like all spam is getting delivered. I did try adding a -p
> option to match the entry in sendmail.mc but it doesn't help (since
> it is using the default value).
>
> Anyone have a clue what to try next? :-(
The -p option is mandatory; it won't start without it, so your startup
script is probably adding that.
Try adding "-d misc" to the commandline, which should cause a line like
this to get logged for any rejected mail:
Jun 25 00:08:56 email1 spamass-milter[1393]: Rejecting
Also, check one of those spams that got through and see if it has an
"X-Spam-Flag: YES" line. This is the header spamass-milter looks for
when you are using the "-r -1" option.
--
Dan Nelson
address@hidden
- Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Steven W. Orr, 2006/06/25
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Steven W. Orr, 2006/06/25
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1,
Dan Nelson <=
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Steven W. Orr, 2006/06/26
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Dan Nelson, 2006/06/26
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Steven W. Orr, 2006/06/26
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Steven W. Orr, 2006/06/27
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Damian Menscher, 2006/06/27
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Dan Nelson, 2006/06/27