[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rewriting header incorrectly?

From: Steve
Subject: Re: Rewriting header incorrectly?
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:03:13 +0000

On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 13:45 -0600, Daniel Norton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Don Armstrong <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>         You've not included the entire header (missing a trailing ')')
> I copied it verbatim.
>         , and
>         it's not rewritten, actually. 
>         spamass-milter cooks up a Received: header for sending to SA
>         so that
>         SA rules can trigger on the contents of it, but it's not
>         complete,
>         because at the time spamass-milter processses the mail,
>         nothing has
>         yet been accepted by the MTA.
>         It probably could include the time and the semi-colon by
>         modifying how
>         the header is cooked up, but right now it doesn't.
> It would be good to at least be RFC2821 compliant, don't you think?
As it's not re-written:
3.8.2 Received Lines in Gatewaying

   When forwarding a message into or out of the Internet environment, a
   gateway MUST prepend a Received: line, but it MUST NOT alter in any
   way a Received: line that is already in the header.

Am I missing something?

If you are unhappy, Daniel, you could ask for your money back under the 
Spamass-milter Guarantee ;-)
Or modify the source yourself....
> --
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Spamass-milt-list mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]