Speech-dispatcher, OpenTTS, and the outcome of my discussion with Brailcom staff.

[William Hubbs]

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:03:38PM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > We usually address that by publishing new rebased versions of branches
> > with the naming convention like experimental -> experimental.1 ->
> > experimental.2 etc.  We may add that into the rules.
> 
> I gues that works,  it does have the downside that testers  have
> to setup a new branch and pay attention for a new branch showing up,
> it can work.  In any case it seems like we can work this out.

It is very easy to rename branches, so this method would not be a
problem.

> > Ok, let's say "reviewer" then if it works better.
> 
> yeah, that sounds more descriptive :-)
 
 I agree, reviewer sounds a lot better.  Opponent is very adversarial.
 To me an "opponent" is someone who would do everything they could to
 make sure that my work would never get into the tree. :-)


William

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.freebsoft.org/pipermail/speechd/attachments/20100729/9a41c8d4/attachment.pgp>