[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:02:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Samuel Thibault, le mer. 19 août 2020 17:55:18 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault, le mer. 19 août 2020 17:52:45 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Nolan Darilek, le mer. 19 août 2020 10:38:56 -0500, a ecrit:
> > > OK, sort of figured it out--I'm not strong in the C. :) Looks like the
> > > state
> > > parameter is the index into the enum values, not the value itself.
> >
> > It's not the index, it's the binary weight
That being said, it does not seem to be actually needed to be so. The
thing is this:
> Note the difference between SPDNotificationType and SPDNotification.
you are getting a SPDNotificationType, not a SPDNotification, so you
have to use values from SPDNotificationType.
Samuel
- Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Nolan Darilek, 2020/08/19
- Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Nolan Darilek, 2020/08/19
- Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/19
- Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/19
- Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Nolan Darilek, 2020/08/19
- Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/19
- Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Nolan Darilek, 2020/08/19
- Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/19
- Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Nolan Darilek, 2020/08/19
- Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/19
Re: Is there an off-by-1 bug in notification callbacks?, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/19