[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[STUMP] Re: Stumpwm-devel Digest, Vol 49, Issue 9

From: Egon Hyszczak
Subject: [STUMP] Re: Stumpwm-devel Digest, Vol 49, Issue 9
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:20:31 -0400

Cool. Does that make sense? Is there anything else that I could do on my end to verify that this should indeed be changed?


On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:00 PM, <address@hidden> wrote:
Send Stumpwm-devel mailing list submissions to

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

You can reach the person managing the list at

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Stumpwm-devel digest..."

Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Re: [PATCH] modified: wrappers.lisp @250 (Julian
     Stecklina) (Julian Stecklina)


Message: 1
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:53:15 +0200
From: Julian Stecklina <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [STUMP] Re: [PATCH] modified: wrappers.lisp @250 (Julian
To: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Egon Hyszczak <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello, I made the change from (os:) to (posix:) because the os -> posix
> alias wasn't carrying over to -Kfull when compiling with clisp on my
> Gentoo install.
> You can check with this snippet:
> for k in base full ; do echo -n "$k "; clisp -K$k -norc -q -x
> '(find-package "OS")' ; done
> I also noticed when browsing through other pieces of code that posix: is
> used elsewhere.
> This change allowed be to compile following the CLISP directions posted on

Okay. I was just curious. :)

Julian Stecklina

The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day
they start making vacuum cleaners - Ernst Jan Plugge


Stumpwm-devel mailing list

End of Stumpwm-devel Digest, Vol 49, Issue 9

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]