[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Archive and Binary Swarm distributions: change strategy?
From: |
Ginger Booth |
Subject: |
Re: Archive and Binary Swarm distributions: change strategy? |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Mar 1998 14:21:15 -0500 |
Pauljohn,
I agree a real Swarm programmer needs to learn Objective-C, etc. The
goal of the binary distribution is just to make the learning curve
easier to climb, instead of making the first few steps so discouragingly
difficult. Learning to configure tcl/tk/blt/gcc is more a sysadmin job
than a programmer job. If the process made you a better Swarm
programmer, it might be worth it. But once you get it done, you've
learned nothing.
So let's agree to differ.
pauljohn wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I don't think it is asking too much to do an archive intall.
> Anyone who is expected to be able to write Objective C code and manage
> Makefiles is capable of following directions about unzipping and
> configuring tcl/tk. If swarm were a "drag and drop" point and click
> kind of thing, I might understand your position. But it isn't.
> The directions need to be clear and thorough, so more effort should be
> paid to that.
>
> I can't imagine a user who is going to be effective with swarm who could
> not do those things. I don't want to put words into your mouth, but I
> suppose you are thinking about people who might like to use swarm but
> don't know if they would, so they need an easy route to try it out.
> Maybe for those people we could just distribute an MPEG file showing
> what heatbugs looks like. Or, as a second thought, if they just want to
> run premade applications, couldn't we distribute executables of
> "swarmapps 1.0.5" and let them run them? Why do they need the swarm
> source at all?
>
> People can learn about their pcs if they have an incentive.
>
> On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Ginger Booth wrote:
>
> > Though I understand your suggestion, Paul, I also know how truly
> > difficult those compiles are. That's how the current trend got
> > launched. Many (most?) potential Swarm users could not pay the door fee
> > of compiling and configuring the prerequisite software.
> >
>
> ==================================
> Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
> to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
> [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
> with "help" in the body of the message.
> ==================================
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
==================================
- problem compil. apps, Omar Andres Armas Aleman, 1998/03/03
- Re: problem compil. apps, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/03/03
- Re: Archive and Binary Swarm distributions: change strategy?, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/03/04
- My personal criticism, Martin Hinsch, 1998/03/06
- Re: My personal criticism, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/03/06
- Re: My personal criticism, Omar Andres Armas Aleman, 1998/03/06
- Re: Archive and Binary Swarm distributions: change strategy?, Pietro Terna, 1998/03/04
- Re: Archive and Binary Swarm distributions: change strategy?, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/03/04