[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Swarm-Support] Time efficiency of at$createActionTo$message
|
From: |
Marshall, James A R |
|
Subject: |
RE: [Swarm-Support] Time efficiency of at$createActionTo$message |
|
Date: |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 17:09:53 -0000 |
OK, one last quick question... if I do this and use the same FCall object to
execute on multiple targets, will all of these target objects become exposed
to Swarm in the same way as my problem where I was creating lots of
Selectors, and will there be a corresponding increase in memory
use/execution time.
James
---
Dr James A R Marshall
Complex Systems Modelling Group (COSMIC)
Department of Earth Science and Engineering
Imperial College London
Tel: +44 (0)20 7594 7493
Fax: +44 (0)20 7594 7444
Container World Project - http://www.ese.ic.ac.uk/research/containerworld/
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcus G. Daniels [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: 05 March 2003 16:53
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Swarm-Support] Time efficiency of
at$createActionTo$message
Marshall, James A R wrote:
>once you create an FCallImpl object, is it possible to change the target
>and/or argument for subsequent re-use?
>
>
No, there's no using-time setter for the target. I suppose there might
as well be.
>Can I do this or will I have to come up with my own method of doing it?
>
Sure, submit a patch to Swarm to do what you want.
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
address@hidden
http://www.swarm.org/mailman/listinfo/support