[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Taler] Dislike Browser Wallets

From: telamohn
Subject: Re: [Taler] Dislike Browser Wallets
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:27:53 +0000

I hear you brother, I'm not taler developer but my guess is that there is 
nothing from stopping anyone from porting taler wallet to a simple library as 
long as you can provide:

1. A secure context to run the wallet in.
2. Ability to send http-requests in order to communicate with exchange & 
3. compatible crypto routines?

Redeeming your product will be a bit different without an html renderer but if 
I'm not entirely wrong you should be able build a wallet that treats the 
exchange & merchant as a rest-api. From what I've seen so far, taler is 
designed to work stateless and without javascript.


‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, December 22, 2018 2:59 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:



> I like the idea of Taler, but my favorite browser is qutebrowser and I
> hate Chrome, Firefox, or just web browser wallets in general enough not
> to consider trying a demo. (To be honest, I hated how cryptocurrencies
> were opting for in-browser wallets too).

> Will there be a software or command line wallet? The latter I would
> prefer over some cancer Electron app with some
> talentless-hipster-flat-color-metro theme. I'm saying this with the
> complete honesty as someone who's been sitting on the sidelines for too
> long.

Attachment: publickey - telamohn@pm.me - 0x3C80D932.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]