[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] wait window and position markers
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] wait window and position markers |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:18:29 +0100 (MET) |
> Also note that there is a patch[1] available to simply disable this
> window as a preference option.
>
> [1]
> http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?func=detailpatch&patch_id=616&group_id=156
>
> This patch will be included in my personal TeXmacs source releases[2].
>
> [2] http://ddaa.net/texmacs#patch
Yes, but what we really need is displaying the message in the status bar,
in red on yellow colors in order to attract the attention.
> > > a. grab the scroller, and move it with the mouse
> > > b. move the cursor to the left of the text, where it is outside all
> > > areas,
> > > and then scroll with page up/down. Otherwise the cursor will get
> > > "caught"
> > > in one of the sessions.
> >
> > Just click with the right-hand button...
>
> I did not know about that before... When left clicking on the
> scrollbar, everyone expects page scroll. The small scroll binding is
> useful (one does not have to point the scroll arrow), but it should
> not be the left-click action.
>
> I suggest these bindings be reversed:
>
> -- left click: page scroll
>
> -- right click: small scroll
Done.
> > > Another possibility is to use some features of the fact that we are
> > > dealing
> > > with a terminal. I can actually know when R is waiting for more input.
> > > That
> > > would be good if at some point you plan to incorporate a system that
> > > would
> > > insert text no at the current cursor position, but at the cursor position
> > > when the input was sent to R. I could then somehow tell TeXmacs: this is
> > > the
> > > output that belongs to input no. 3, this is the output that belongs to
> > > input
> > > no. 4, and so on.
> >
> > That sounds good. We indeed plan to add support for this as soon as
> > we can remember the position where the output should appear.
>
> Are not "positions" (i.e. markers) already supported in TeXmacs?
Yes, but not for sessions.