[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict
From: |
Ralf Treinen |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:47:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:21:01PM +0200, David Allouche wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:32:31PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > copiled a summary of the ongoing discussion and announced it on the
> > debian-devel mailing list. The summary can be found at
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
> My general impression is that, if one does not care about invariant
> sections, there is no convincing reason not to use plain GPL instead of
> GFDL. Do you have a link which explains clearly the practical issues for
> documentation authors?
>
> What if someone would contribute to a GFDL documentation if and only if
> those contribution are licensed under the GPL? Is there a way to use a
> loophole in the "aggregated work" clause?
Not being a lawyer, I really cannot answer these questions. And I don't
want to speculate. What does the FSF say about licensing documentation
under GPL?
-Ralf.
--
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict, Ralf Treinen, 2003/10/06
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict, David Allouche, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict, Alvaro Tejero Cantero, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict, Ralf Treinen, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict, Joris van der Hoeven, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict, David Allouche, 2003/10/08
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict, Joris van der Hoeven, 2003/10/08
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict, David Allouche, 2003/10/08
Re: [Texmacs-dev] GNU FSL and Debian FDL conflict,
Ralf Treinen <=