[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Texmacs-dev] A \udots suggestion
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
[Texmacs-dev] A \udots suggestion |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 15:48:03 -0700 |
TeXmacs defines \udots in exported latex by:
\newcommand{\udots}{{\mbox{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{$\ddots$}}}}
It seems unnecessary to do this. For example xdvi complains
that rotation is not supported, and the rotated dots are not
displayed correctly.
Why not just imitate the plain tex definition of ddots:
\newcommand{\udots}{\mathinner{\mskip1mu\raise1pt\vbox{\kern7pt\hbox{.}}
\mskip2mu\raise4pt\hbox{.}\mskip2mu\raise7pt\hbox{.}\mskip1mu}}
This works perfectly well and saves loading graphicx.
Daniel bump
- [Texmacs-dev] A \udots suggestion,
bump <=