[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok
From: |
Peter \"Firefly\" Lund |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok |
Date: |
Sat, 3 May 2003 14:38:10 +0200 (MEST) |
On Sat, 3 May 2003 address@hidden wrote:
> OK I understand your point. But I am strongly against char usage. It is far
> easier to use uint8_t in buffers. I reserve chars only for "C" string
> handling.
The whole point is that they are also used as C strings.
> > What is the usecase?
>
> If you use libtcc for scripting, then you might want to have several
> compilation contexts at the same time.
Not particularly clear. That is not a use case, that is a statement that
use cases exist.
-Peter
"Of course, I'm not unbiased, but in my humble opinion, I've
gotten close to something that I can be really proud of."
-- Knuth on The Art of Computer Programming.
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, Peter \"Firefly\" Lund, 2003/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, Philippe Ribet, 2003/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, Peter \"Firefly\" Lund, 2003/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, Philippe Ribet, 2003/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, Peter \"Firefly\" Lund, 2003/05/02
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, Dave Long, 2003/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, Peter \"Firefly\" Lund, 2003/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, fabrice . bellard, 2003/05/03
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, Peter \"Firefly\" Lund, 2003/05/03
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok, fabrice . bellard, 2003/05/03
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCCState, tcc_state, and ch/file/tok,
Peter \"Firefly\" Lund <=