[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] (no subject)

From: Guillaume POIRIER
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] (no subject)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:10:13 +0200


On 9/13/06, Dave Dodge <address@hidden> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 11:46:45AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:


The problem is that for the workloads where IA-64 is king, there's
things like huge core counts and RAM sizes that the other hardware
can't easily reach yet.  If AMD can get Opteron scaled up to those
levels, though, it'll probably be the final nail in Itanium's coffin.

Can't Opteron natively scale up to 8 sockets (so 16 core with
dual-code) natively?
Can't Opteon address already enough RAM for all realistic workloads?
The only shortcoming I see with Operon (right now) is the size of its
cache, not the size of the addressable memory nor the number of

... or am I missing smth?

With DADVSI (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DADVSI), France finally has
a lead on USA on selling out individuals right to corporations!
Vive la France!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]