[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] the most useless question on this list about basic c+

From: Thomas Preud'homme
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] the most useless question on this list about basic c++ extensions
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 23:08:52 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.32-5-686; KDE/4.4.3; i686; ; )

On Saturday 08 May 2010 17:05:32 mobi phil wrote:
> Hello,
> the most useless question on this list:
> did anybody think about adding basic C++ extensions to tcc, eventually
> trivial form of templates?

tcc misses at least one thing for C++: exception handling. I plan to implement 
it but I won't start the implementation before mid june so don't be too in a 
hurry. :) And of course the C++ parsing must be added. As some some rules are 
different than in C (like priority of operators), this might require some 
(maybe minor) refactoring. Also, the calling convention is different so there 
is work to do in the symbols generation as well. That's for what I know, I may 
have forgotten things.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]