[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] the most useless question on this list about basic c+
Re: [Tinycc-devel] the most useless question on this list about basic c++ extensions
Sun, 9 May 2010 23:08:52 +0200
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.32-5-686; KDE/4.4.3; i686; ; )
On Saturday 08 May 2010 17:05:32 mobi phil wrote:
> the most useless question on this list:
> did anybody think about adding basic C++ extensions to tcc, eventually
> trivial form of templates?
tcc misses at least one thing for C++: exception handling. I plan to implement
it but I won't start the implementation before mid june so don't be too in a
hurry. :) And of course the C++ parsing must be added. As some some rules are
different than in C (like priority of operators), this might require some
(maybe minor) refactoring. Also, the calling convention is different so there
is work to do in the symbols generation as well. That's for what I know, I may
have forgotten things.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.