[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++
From: |
Basile Starynkevitch |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++ |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:35:58 +0200 |
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:29:20 -0500
"Rick C. Hodgin" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Are there any plans for a TinyC++ compiler?
If you aim at compiling the full ISO C++, it cannot be tiny (because
the C++ language specification is large & bloated).
If you want some small & fast compiler, it could only parse a small subset of
C++.
One could perhaps imagine using an existing C++ front-end, but that is
not tiny anymore.
For instance, one could imagine adapting tinyc to the output of the GCC
C++ front-end (e.g. to early Gimple or Generic in GCC parlance) but
that is not tiny anymore.
Cheers.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mine, sont seulement les miennes} ***
- [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++,
Basile Starynkevitch <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Basile Starynkevitch, 2010/10/19
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Alain Greppin, 2010/10/19
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/19
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Basile Starynkevitch, 2010/10/19
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/19
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Basile Starynkevitch, 2010/10/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/29