[Tinycc-devel] RE :Re: Using clang

[Christian JULLIEN]

Thomas, your last commit lets Makefile find again GCC and now correctly sets CFLAGS with warnings we want to ignore.

Christian



> ----- Message d'origine -----
> De : "Thomas Preud'homme" <address@hidden>
> Date ven. 15/02/2013 14:27 (GMT +01:00)
> À : "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Cc : "Urs Janssen" <address@hidden>
> Objet : Re: [Tinycc-devel] Using clang
>
> Le vendredi 15 février 2013 13:39:57, grischka a écrit :
> > You wrote:
> > > fixed pasto in in 108b2876; background for the additional $CC test is:
> > > GCC_MAJOR may be set even is $CC not realy gcc (but i.e. clang, which (as
> > > of 3.1) requires an addtional CFLAG to accept the non portable (gnuisms
> > > all over the place; try to cimpile tcc with Sun^HOracle, Intel,
> > > Pathscale, ... compiler) code).
> > 
> > Using "-fheinous-gnu-extensions" for clang makes sense but I still
> > don't see how "GCC_MAJOR may be set even is $CC not realy gcc"???
>
> I suppose like for tinycc, lots of code out there test GCC_MAJOR and GCC_MINOR 
> for available features so other compilers with good compatibility with gcc 
> have no choice but to pretend to be gcc.
>
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > --- grischka
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel