[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc? / JIT
From: |
Armin Steinhoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc? / JIT |
Date: |
Wed, 01 May 2013 18:03:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
KHMan wrote:
> On 5/1/2013 7:10 PM, Armin Steinhoff wrote:
>> Daniel Glöckner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:14:58PM +0200, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
>>>> The fear of proprietary forks seems
>>>> unfounded because there is already a mature BSD licensed C compiler
>>>> (clang) available for people to base their work on.
>>> Let's see..
>>> $ size /opt/llvm/bin/clang
>>> text data bss dec hex filename
>>> 38999778 1193992 54640 40248410 266245a
>>> /opt/llvm/bin/clang
>>>
>>> I think TinyCC might be preferred by some people who just need a
>>> small scripting engine.
>>
>> TinyCC ist the only compiler which provides JIT compiling for ARM
>
> http://luajit.org/luajit.html
> http://luajit.org/performance_arm.html
Interesting ! Thanks !
--Armin
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?, Daniel Glöckner, 2013/05/01
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/05/01
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?, Rob Landley, 2013/05/01
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?, Daniel Glöckner, 2013/05/01
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?, grischka, 2013/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?, u-tcc-uepj, 2013/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?, Daniel Glöckner, 2013/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?, Milutin Jovanović, 2013/05/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?, u-tcc-uepj, 2013/05/02