[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC as default compiler
From: |
Daniel Glöckner |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC as default compiler |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:30:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 01:19:55AM -0500, stephen Turner wrote:
> I have found tcc and wondered how viable it is as a alternative to gcc and
> clang/llvm for my uses.
What is your motivation to switch away from gcc/clang?
The benefits of TinyCC are smaller and faster compiler but it is
by far less tested and only does minor optimizations.
> Does it use makefiles?
It's a compiler, not a development environment.
Or are you asking if the compiler is built using makefiles?
> can it be a simple drop in replacement for GCC (atleast for c if not c++
> too)
For simple code, yes.
> From what i have read so far its only a c compiler? Or is it being built
> out to support c++ as well?
IIRC there have been some attempts at adding various aspects of
C++ into TinyCC, but none of them have been merged back into the
main repository. There is a recent discussion to use the CFront
C++ to C translator with TinyCC.
Best regards,
Daniel
- [Tinycc-devel] TCC as default compiler, stephen Turner, 2014/12/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC as default compiler,
Daniel Glöckner <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC as default compiler, cbdev, 2014/12/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC as default compiler, stephen Turner, 2014/12/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC as default compiler, stephen Turner, 2014/12/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC as default compiler, stephen Turner, 2014/12/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC as default compiler, stephen Turner, 2014/12/09
- [Tinycc-devel] sinf/sin problems, Oleg N. Cher, 2014/12/23
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] sinf/sin problems, Mads, 2014/12/24
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] sinf/sin problems, Aharon Robbins, 2014/12/24
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] sinf/sin problems, Lee Duhem, 2014/12/24