Re: [Tinycc-devel] OT (Re: modern c++ compiler written in C)

[Sergey Korshunoff]

>> Looks like a right way to get a working cfront is to start from cfront-1
>> and then replace files with ones from 3.0.3 sources.
> Depends on the definitions of "right" and "working". What are you aiming at?
> We know (modulo my laziness to express the knowhow in a "traditional"
> notation) how to get a well working cfront-3.0.

There is a problem with build system (makefiles defines) which are not friendly.
cfront-1.0 is prepared already regarding this problem. cfront-1.0 has
a simpler to
understand file layout comparing to the cfront-3.0. I always prefere
to start/continue
something working.

> An easier but much less certain way would be to try to talk to someone at
> AT&T - this would be certainly a lot more efficient, _if_ it could work.
Easiest way to start this process is to place cfront project on the
github (for example).
Some attention of the press to this problem may help.

I think all are forgot about cfront like all forgot p2c compiler.
cfront can help to teach a C++ But for this a cfront must be usefull
on the modern
systems.