[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation
From: |
Edmund Grimley Evans |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 23:17:00 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Sergey Korshunoff <address@hidden>:
> > Yeah, well, we know what VLAs are. The question was, which software do
> > you use, that requires VLAs "with interrupts" (whatever that's supposed to
> > mean)?
>
> Linux/FreeBSD kernel don't use VLA? Shure? How about kernel modules?
I don't know. Can you find out?
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sparse/msg03135.html says that
"variable-length arrays are problematic" in the Linux kernel (because
there would be bad consequences if someone tried to allocate too much
memory on the stack).
- [Tinycc-devel] Modified/broken resolution of include dirs, (continued)
- [Tinycc-devel] Modified/broken resolution of include dirs, avih, 2015/11/05
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Edmund Grimley Evans, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Edmund Grimley Evans, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Edmund Grimley Evans, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Michael Matz, 2015/11/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation,
Edmund Grimley Evans <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/10
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] VLA implementation, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/10