[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] whatever (was: (no subject))
|
From: |
Michael Matz |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] whatever (was: (no subject)) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 12 May 2019 00:32:26 +0200 (CEST) |
|
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) |
Hello Andy,
On Fri, 10 May 2019, ANDY TAKKER wrote:
A lot of words are said about compatibility and portability, but GCC
and PCC bring one result, and TCC is completely different.
Sure. I'm assuming that's not a problem for you.
Here is another interesting link closely related to the TCC.
https://forum.nasm.us/index.php?topic=2524.0
That seems to be about nasm, not TCC.
nop <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
jmp L8D <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
jmp L8D <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Yes, TCC is a non-optimizing single-pass compiler. The price to pay for
this is non-optimal code.
Ciao,
Michael.