[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Re: github

From: James Mills
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Re: github
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:22:40 +1000

I would go with Github Actions if it were up to me.
But write the "CI" logic in shell scripts as much as you can with the goal of being able to run what CI does locally (if the need arises, and it always does).

At our company we've had a lot of success with Github Actions and they are nicely tightly integrated right there alongside your Github Repo.

Kind regards


James Mills / prologic

E: address@hidden
W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:28 AM Austin English <address@hidden> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 11:35 AM Michael Matz <address@hidden> wrote:

On Wed, 22 Apr 2020, Daniel Glöckner wrote:

>> I did macOS test with the help of vagrant.
>> You can download any OS from their platform:
>> https://app.vagrantup.com/boxes/search
>> and its very convenient as it automates the generation and
>> integration (ssh connection, shared folders, ...).
>> And as it is a VM it is 100% macOS (no emulation with its quirks)
> The thing is that the macOS license AFAIK allows the use only on Apple
> hardware. There is no "official" macOS VM on Vagrant. All macOS VMs you
> can find on Vagrant have been provided by users.

Yeah, thought so.  But darling might be a way indeed (haven't yet looked
at it, but if the low-level userspace is complete enough, and it must be
from what they claim to be able to run, it should be enough for tinycc).

(But I didn't know about the other macos possibilities either, so thanks
for the info)

Travis-CI integrates with github well, and supports linux and osx (no windows though):

GPG: 267B CC1F 053F 0749 (expires 2021/02/18)
Tinycc-devel mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]