[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tlf-devel] Xtlf-1.0.1beta is avalable
From: |
Joop Stakenborg |
Subject: |
Re: [Tlf-devel] Xtlf-1.0.1beta is avalable |
Date: |
Wed, 24 May 2006 00:17:43 +0200 |
On Tue, 23 May 2006 16:52:07 -0400
Ed <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Joop, this is what I get using the .deb pkg.
>
> > autek:/home/ed# exit
> > address@hidden:~$ xtlf
> > Initializing the libraries
> > Getting the GUI
> > Initializing
> > Filling hash table
> > Initializing countries
> > Show windows
> > Start cluster thread
> > Start gmfsk thread
> > Start main loop
> > Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_invalidate_rect: assertion `window != NULL'
> > failed at /usr/share/xtlf/xtlf.pl line 1734.
> > Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_invalidate_rect: assertion `window != NULL'
> > failed at /usr/share/xtlf/xtlf.pl line 1734.
> > Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_paint_box: assertion `style->depth ==
> > gdk_drawable_get_depth (window)' failed at /usr/share/xtlf/xtlf.pl line
> > 1589.
> > address@hidden:~$
On Debian/Unstable I see:
Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_paint_box: assertion `style->depth ==
gdk_drawable_get_depth (window)' failed at /usr/share/xtlf/xtlf.pl line 1589.
>
> This is on an IBM A20M laptop with Debian testing. I plan on using xTLF
> for RTTY contesting. I notice the GUI and windows as well as the overall
> performance to be "jerky" for lack of a better word. There is a
> noticeable lag before a window opens or a function executes. Am I
> missing a needed package ??
No, you don't. As explained by Rein in an earlier message, xtlf takes about 10
seconds to start on his machine. I think this is mainly caused by the use if
Perl. Perl being an interpreted language, it just isn't very fast.
I am using a 700 MHz AMD, xtlf takes 15 seconds to load...
>
> Ed W3NR
>
Regards,
Joop PG4I