Re: tramp-tramp-file-p

[Mark A. Hershberger]

address@hidden (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> well, in emacs lisp, 0 is true, so maybe the place where it is
> interpreted should be fixed, rather than tramp-tramp-file-p.
>
> do you have more details?

Well, my "fix" only caused more problems anyway.

The problem was in tramp-handle-shell-command.  M-! in a tramp
buffer should execute the command on the remote box.  I found
that when I tried M-!, I got the message
"tramp-handle-shell-command called with non-tramp directory:".

Mark.

-- 
You are a mystery as deep as the sea; the more I search, the more
I find, and the more I find the more I search for you.
            -- St. Catherine of Siena