[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2003-02-12 / tramp-remote-path vs. LD_LIBRARY_PATH

From: Kai Großjohann
Subject: Re: 2003-02-12 / tramp-remote-path vs. LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:36:45 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3.50

address@hidden writes:

>>>>>> "KG" == Kai Großjohann <address@hidden> writes:
>     KG> That's right.  You're the first to need it, I think.  Do you need it?
> Well, not me personally,

Yes, I understood the theoretical problem.  (After you mentioned it.
I hadn't thought of that before.  Thanks for that hint!)  But the
question is, is it also a problem in practice?  Are there programs
that people wish to use with Tramp that depend on that part of the

Now coming to think of it, I think it's not really a problem: people's
shell init files will set up $LD_LIBRARY_PATH appropriately, and Tramp
will just inherit that setting.

So, from the theoretical point of view, there is no problem :-)
But then, in theory there is no difference between theory and
Installation via wizzard  (Linux-Magazin, German magazine)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]