[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:15:12 +0200
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/20.7 (hpux)
"Alex V. Koval" <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Michael,
>> Currently, I'm implementing the fish method as proof-of-the-concept.
> I hope this will work faster :) Thank you! I think it was me who originally
> suggested to look into KDE Kpart.
... and I was reluctant at the beginning :-)
> While fish:// protocol really offers an
> excellent speed, I rarely use it since Emacs is much more powerful as
> purpose editor, so having a faster implementation of shell editing transfers
> would be really great.
It is not proven yet that it will be faster. From the tramp-fish.el
;; It looks like the file information retrieval is slower, because the
;; fish protocol misses commands for some necessary information, which
;; must be emulated by the extensive #EXEC command. Maybe it can be
;; better optimised.
Best regards, Michael.
- async?, Alex V. Koval, 2006/10/05
- Re: async?, Michael Albinus, 2006/10/05
- Message not available
- Re: async?,
Michael Albinus <=