trans-coord/gnun/philosophy free-sw.af.html fre...

[Yavor Doganov]

CVSROOT:        /sources/trans-coord
Module name:    trans-coord
Changes by:     Yavor Doganov <yavor>   10/04/29 18:25:07

Modified files:
        gnun/philosophy: free-sw.af.html free-sw.bg.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/trans-coord/gnun/philosophy/free-sw.af.html?cvsroot=trans-coord&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/trans-coord/gnun/philosophy/free-sw.bg.html?cvsroot=trans-coord&r1=1.18&r2=1.19

Patches:
Index: free-sw.af.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/trans-coord/trans-coord/gnun/philosophy/free-sw.af.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- free-sw.af.html     30 Jan 2010 19:25:14 -0000      1.17
+++ free-sw.af.html     29 Apr 2010 18:25:07 -0000      1.18
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-<q>Vrye sagteware</q> gaan oor vryheid en nie prys nie. Daarom die woord
-<q>vry</q> en nie gratis nie.  Vrye sagteware kan jou geld kos terwyl
-sommige sagteware wat jy verniet kry nie noodwendig vry is nie.
+&ldquo;Free software&rdquo; is a matter of liberty, not price.  To
+understand the concept, you should think of &ldquo;free&rdquo; as in
+&ldquo;free speech,&rdquo; not as in &ldquo;free beer.&rdquo;
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -94,7 +94,8 @@
 In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
 to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
 source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
-necessary condition for free software.
+necessary condition for free software.  Obfuscated &ldquo;source code&rdquo;
+is not real source code and does not count as source code.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -143,13 +144,13 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
-be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
-distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
-such free commercial software is very important.  You may have paid money to
-get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
-But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
-copy and change the software, even to <a
+&ldquo;Free software&rdquo; does not mean &ldquo;noncommercial.&rdquo; A
+free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no
+longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important.  You may
+have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained
+copies at no charge.  But regardless of how you got your copies, you always
+have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to <a
 href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
 </p>
 
@@ -162,20 +163,20 @@
 <p>
 However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
 they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
-your freedom to make and use modified versions privately.  Rules that <q>if
-you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
-that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition.  (Note that
-such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
-at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to the users for
-versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
-as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
-developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately.  Rules that
+&ldquo;if you make your version available in this way, you must make it
+available in that way also&rdquo; can be acceptable too, on the same
+condition.  (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to
+publish your version at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to
+the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It
+is also acceptable for the license to require that you identify your
+modifications as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-In the GNU project, we use <q><a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+In the GNU project, we use &ldquo;<a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>&rdquo; to protect these freedoms
 legally for everyone.  But <a
 href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
 free software</a> also exists.  We believe there are important reasons why
@@ -185,10 +186,9 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Sien <a
-href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html";>Kategorie&euml;</a> van
-Vrye Sagteware vir 'n beskrywing van hoe vrye sagteware, kopielinkse
-sagteware en ander kategorie&euml; sagteware verband hou met mekaar.
+See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>
+for a description of how &ldquo;free software,&rdquo; &ldquo;copylefted
+software&rdquo; and other categories of software relate to each other.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -223,13 +223,13 @@
 
 <p>
 When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
-<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
-issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
-embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
+&ldquo;give away&rdquo; or &ldquo;for free,&rdquo; because those terms imply
+that the issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as
+&ldquo;piracy&rdquo; embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
 href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
 Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  We also have a list of
-proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
-software</q></a> into various languages.
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
+&ldquo;free software&rdquo;</a> into various languages.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -295,11 +295,13 @@
 <h2 id="open-source">Oopbron?</h2>
 
 <p>
-'n Ander groep het begin om die begrip oopbron te gebruik om iets
-soortgelyks (maar nie identies) aan vrye sagteware te beteken.  Die begrip
-vrye sagteware word verkies omdat dit vryheid beklemtoon.  Die woord <a
-href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html";>oop
-verwys nooit na vryheid nie</a>.
+Another group has started using the term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; to mean
+something close (but not identical) to &ldquo;free software.&rdquo; We
+prefer the term &ldquo;free software&rdquo; because, once you have heard
+that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom.  The
+word &ldquo;open&rdquo; <a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> never refers to
+freedom</a>.
 </p>
 
 <h2 id="History">History</h2>
@@ -312,6 +314,10 @@
 <ul>
 
 <li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.91&amp;r2=1.92";>Version
+1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
+
+<li><a
 
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.89&amp;r2=1.90";>Version
 1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
 your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
@@ -442,7 +448,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 Opgedateer:
 
-$Date: 2010/01/30 19:25:14 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 18:25:07 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: free-sw.bg.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/trans-coord/trans-coord/gnun/philosophy/free-sw.bg.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- free-sw.bg.html     30 Jan 2010 19:25:14 -0000      1.18
+++ free-sw.bg.html     29 Apr 2010 18:25:07 -0000      1.19
@@ -28,9 +28,9 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-„Свободният софтуер“ е израз на 
свободата, а не на цената.  За да разберете
-концепцията, мислете си за „свобода на 
словото“, а не „безплатен
-обяд“<sup><a href="#TransNote1">1</a></sup>.
+&ldquo;Free software&rdquo; is a matter of liberty, not price.  To
+understand the concept, you should think of &ldquo;free&rdquo; as in
+&ldquo;free speech,&rdquo; not as in &ldquo;free beer.&rdquo;
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -97,7 +97,8 @@
 In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
 to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
 source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
-necessary condition for free software.
+necessary condition for free software.  Obfuscated &ldquo;source code&rdquo;
+is not real source code and does not count as source code.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -146,13 +147,13 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
-be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
-distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
-such free commercial software is very important.  You may have paid money to
-get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
-But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
-copy and change the software, even to <a
+&ldquo;Free software&rdquo; does not mean &ldquo;noncommercial.&rdquo; A
+free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no
+longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important.  You may
+have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained
+copies at no charge.  But regardless of how you got your copies, you always
+have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to <a
 href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
 </p>
 
@@ -165,20 +166,20 @@
 <p>
 However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
 they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
-your freedom to make and use modified versions privately.  Rules that <q>if
-you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
-that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition.  (Note that
-such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
-at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to the users for
-versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
-as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
-developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately.  Rules that
+&ldquo;if you make your version available in this way, you must make it
+available in that way also&rdquo; can be acceptable too, on the same
+condition.  (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to
+publish your version at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to
+the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It
+is also acceptable for the license to require that you identify your
+modifications as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-In the GNU project, we use <q><a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+In the GNU project, we use &ldquo;<a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>&rdquo; to protect these freedoms
 legally for everyone.  But <a
 href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
 free software</a> also exists.  We believe there are important reasons why
@@ -188,9 +189,9 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Прегледайте статията „<a 
href="/philosophy/categories.html">Видове свободен
-софтуер</a>“ за описанието как категориите 
„свободен софтуер“, „софтуер със
-защита copyleft“ и другите видове се 
съотнасят един с друг.
+See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>
+for a description of how &ldquo;free software,&rdquo; &ldquo;copylefted
+software&rdquo; and other categories of software relate to each other.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -225,13 +226,13 @@
 
 <p>
 When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
-<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
-issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
-embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
+&ldquo;give away&rdquo; or &ldquo;for free,&rdquo; because those terms imply
+that the issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as
+&ldquo;piracy&rdquo; embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
 href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
 Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  We also have a list of
-proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
-software</q></a> into various languages.
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
+&ldquo;free software&rdquo;</a> into various languages.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -296,12 +297,13 @@
 <h2 id="open-source">Отворен код?</h2>
 
 <p>
-Една друга група започна да използва 
термина „отворен код“, за да обозначи
-нещо близко (но не идентично) със 
„свободния софтуер“.  Ние предпочитаме
-понятието „свободен софтуер“, защото 
веднъж като чуете, че се отнася за
-свободата, а не за цената, то извиква в 
съзнанието — „свобода“.  Думата
-„отворен“ <a 
href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.html">просто
-не прави това</a>.
+Another group has started using the term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; to mean
+something close (but not identical) to &ldquo;free software.&rdquo; We
+prefer the term &ldquo;free software&rdquo; because, once you have heard
+that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom.  The
+word &ldquo;open&rdquo; <a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> never refers to
+freedom</a>.
 </p>
 
 <h2 id="History">History</h2>
@@ -314,6 +316,10 @@
 <ul>
 
 <li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.91&amp;r2=1.92";>Version
+1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
+
+<li><a
 
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.89&amp;r2=1.90";>Version
 1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
 your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
@@ -466,7 +472,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 Последно обновяване:
 
-$Date: 2010/01/30 19:25:14 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 18:25:07 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>