[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing
From: |
James Spencer |
Subject: |
Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 06:25:22 -0500 |
Me being a total nag:
"
[quote="rogue"]
Should the Thunderguard also have a third swing then?[/quote]
At the risk of speaking for Dave, I would assume so.
"
On the Assasin, and this is just my opinion (I'm happy that the
Northerners are getting defanged a bit however this works out). Yes,
the thing that makes these guys such a terror is the number of
attacks, not the damage they cause... With 3 attacks even a unit with
70% defence is pretty likely to come out of the altercation
poisoned... This certainly would defang the bugger...
I'm a little more iffy on the Guardsman- That certainly would make him
a terror to deal with (maybe a bit too much so?).
oh, I have one other little nitpick, even with the guardsman at the
current 5-3 shouldn't the Dwarvish Stalwart go from 6-3 to 7-3 to
distribute the damage in his line a bit better?
- [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing, David White, 2005/03/01
- [Wesnoth-dev] Improving the dwarves, Asa Swain, 2005/03/02
- Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing,
James Spencer <=
- Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing, Richard Kettering, 2005/03/02
- Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing, David White, 2005/03/02
- Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing, James Spencer, 2005/03/03
- Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing, John McNabb, 2005/03/03
- Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing, David White, 2005/03/03
- Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing, John McNabb, 2005/03/04
- Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing, Asa Swain, 2005/03/04