xlog-discussion
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xlog-discussion] A few xlog patches


From: Werner Koch
Subject: Re: [Xlog-discussion] A few xlog patches
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 10:48:18 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:20, address@hidden said:
> Regarding a log format, why not just ise ADIF?

Because ADIF is not easy to parse with standard Unix tools.  This mostly
is because it uses an tag-length-value system.  It is fine as a data
exchange protocol but hard to work with unless you use dedicated tools.

Most other log programs are using SQL databases which have a very
expressive query language and cal also be used concurrently.  From my
understanding xlog shall be an easy to use and single user log program.
Thus I doubt that a complicated log on-disk format makes sense.  The
current flog format is okay but somewhat limited in extensibility and
you need to take care if you want to change it with an editor.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

Attachment: pgpkZOVNMUSH9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]