[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules
From: |
Alan Cox |
Subject: |
Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules |
Date: |
19 Aug 2003 14:00:21 +0100 |
On Maw, 2003-08-19 at 10:55, James Best wrote:
> Adding transports looks to be easy - but what about the protocol? I
> believe he said about "network protocols". I, too, am curious about
> this. I understand that X is the protocol, and without it it wouldn't
> be X. I have looked at the protocol, though, and it is far from the
> most efficient I have seen.
X is very efficient, it has a few known glitches. See Keith Packard and
Jim Gettys paper and presentation on X performance, right now most of
the performance problems are apps (and libraries) doing daft things.
- Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, (continued)
- Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, Craig Ringer, 2003/08/22
- [xougen] Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, weigelt, 2003/08/22
- [xougen] Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, weigelt, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, James Hoegl, 2003/08/19
- [xougen] Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- [xougen] Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, Alan Cox, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules,
Alan Cox <=
- Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, James Hoegl, 2003/08/22
- [xougen] Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, Craig Ringer, 2003/08/22
- [xougen] RE: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules, David Ross, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Xouvert-general] Network transparentcy and modules (was: platforms), William Lahti, 2003/08/22