[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [patch] Update of dinbrief.el

From: Dr. Werner Fink
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [patch] Update of dinbrief.el
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:12:32 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:49:39PM +0100, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> * Werner Fink (2011-02-09) writes:
> > I'd like to submit a patch to make the dinbriefl LaTeX style work
> > together with the current available dinbrief class style found at
> > the TeX archive of
> Thanks!
> AFAIK you don't have a copyright assignment for AUCTeX on file at the
> FSF.  Would it be possible for you to assign the copyright for your
> changes in AUCTeX to the FSF?  If this is the case, I'll send you a
> request form via private mail.

As long as the line with the author remains, you may assign
copyright to FSF.

> Also, the patch could then be installed right away because this won't
> negatively affect the copyright assignment situation for the file.
> There are a few things in the patch I'd like to change, though.  For
> example `TeX-deactivate-mark' is already defined in tex.el and the
> functions in a style file should be prefixed with LaTeX-<package-name>-.
> If you don't mind I'll fix these issues after applying the patch.

The problem was that there was a difference between XEmacs and
GNU-Emacs.  If this is fixed in the meanwhile there is no
need for the definition, that is it could be removed.

Beside this ... maybe it would be a good idea to be able to
use UTF-8 for the german word `Empfänger'.


  "Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
          a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]