[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing]
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing] |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Sep 2015 22:44:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
> Especially I wanted to see how to toggle it off and on in a buffer.
>
> Rationale: if the feature is set to invisible and you write __ this is
> a LaTeX error but you would *not* see it (I know this what was the
> mayor objection against that feature.)
>
> When I run customize or setq for that matter I can toggle indeed that
> feature on and off, but not as I thought by turning font-lock on and
> off, but I have to kill the buffer and reopen it again.
A simply `font-lock-flush' should suffice.
> Can somebody confirm this?
That's normal behavior. When font-lock has fontified everything and
nothing has changed, why should it refontify anything?
Bye,
Tassilo
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^», Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^», Tassilo Horn, 2015/09/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^», Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^», Tassilo Horn, 2015/09/03
- [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing] (was: sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^»), Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/04
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing],
Tassilo Horn <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing], Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/04
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing], Tassilo Horn, 2015/09/04
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing], Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/05