Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros

[Mosè Giordano]

Hi David,

2016-07-11 11:50 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
>> I have the impression that currently AUCTeX doesn't require to be
>> compiled.  My understanding is that with this change compilation would
>> become practically mandatory (at least in order to exploit this
>> feature), is it correct?
>
> No.  It will interpret just fine, only slower.  Which is basically the
> expectation for loading uncompiled code anyway, though usually most of
> the savings from compilation are expected more on run time than load
> time.

Good to know, thank you!

Bye,
Mosè